Search for: "Custody of King v. King"
Results 1 - 20
of 435
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
In King v. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 11:21 am
King. [read post]
23 Sep 2016, 8:50 am
In King v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
King. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:26 am
King. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 6:30 am
Through a reading of Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 9:46 am
King v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:00 am
U.S. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:13 am
By Sade Knox, Intern, Woodruff Family Law Group King v. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 5:18 pm
Kings County Child Custody Attorneys, Kings County Child Visitation Attorneys and Stephen Bilkis & Associates are excellent representatives of child custody and visitation cases. [read post]
17 May 2023, 5:00 am
FAMILY COURT ERRED BY NOT HOLDING A “FULL AND PLENARY HEARING”After the Kings County Family Court awarded custody of the parties’ child to the mother, the dad appealed.On its review, the Appellate Division, Second Department, agreed that a reversible error had been committed. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 2:40 pm
"I guess it's the difference between Tyson's chickens and the free-range variety.United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 4:00 pm
Custody disputes can sometimes remind me of the Biblical story of King Solomon (1 Kings 3:16-28). [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 7:35 am
However, it was made in 1998, when the Court heard Quality King v L’anza, a case involving similar issues concerning the first sale doctrine and § 602. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
King. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 3:25 pm
Friederwitzer v Friedewitzer and Matter of Francois v Hall held that an award of custody must be based upon the best interests of the child, and there is no prima facie right to the custody of the child in either parent. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 5:00 pm
”And it's in our best interests to end it right there.# # #Matter of Jones v Rodriguez (Decision & Order) [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 2:05 am
Jennifer Perrins, barrister, of 1 King’s Bench Walk, considers the Court of Appeal’s judgment in S v C, the first appeal concerning an Article 13b ‘defence’ under the Hague Convention following the Supreme Court’s decision in Re E (Children) (Abduction: Custody Appeal). [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:29 am
"U.S. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
In Part One of this column, I considered the case of Maryland v. [read post]
