Search for: "D’AGOSTINO V. STATE" Results 21 - 40 of 41
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2011, 6:39 am by Howard Knopf
 Panel chairs were Pina DAgostino, Carys Crag, David Vaver and Victor Nabhan.There were some notable new faces and speakers, including Jonathan Griffiths from Queen Mary, University of London and Mindaugas Kiškis from Lithuania, to name just two. [read post]
31 May 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/fv52lvoA7Y -> Counterfeit Italian food products face trade group scrutiny http://t.co/4tkMUS1mXo -> Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-05-25: Lawyers circling lawyers in frenzied Facebook ownership flap… http://t.co/TQnyu67QHa -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-05-25 http://t.co/Kn9Vjico9V -> This “Artist” Takes Your Instagram Photos And Sells Them For $90,000 http://t.co/pgCVPwaWzN -> Publishers Win High Court Support in… [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
20 Mar 2019, 3:34 pm by Jeanne Huang
If a Chinese citizen leaves its Hukou address and resides in another address continuously for more than one year, the latter address becomes his habitual residence and the court in that address also has jurisdiction. [8] Blohn v Desser [1962] 2 Q.B. 116, 123; Rossano v Manufacturers Life Insurance Co Ltd [1963] 2 Q.B. 352, 382–383; Vogel v RA Kohnstamm Ltd [1973] Q.B. 133; see also Patterson v… [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
The BBC has also noted recent statements from Saudi Arabias Foreign Minister stating that suspects are to be tried in Saudi Arabia and profiled Khashoggi. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint “is deemed to allege whatever can be implied from its statements by fair and reasonable intendment” (Foley v DAgostino, 21 AD2d 60, 65 [1964] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]). [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 7:02 am by Joy Waltemath
As a result the Commonwealth was granted its motion to dismiss their complaint (DAgostino v. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
12 Jun 2022, 6:39 pm by Kurt R. Karst
DAgostino v. ev3, Inc., 845 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2016), was seen as a death knell for the fraud‑on-the-FDA theory in FCA cases. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm by admin
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:18 pm
  Ian Boyko, Canadian Federation of Students Expand fair dealing in line with the case of CHH v. [read post]