Search for: "D. BRINKER" Results 1 - 20 of 70
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Last week we filed a supplemental brief under Rule of Court 8.520(d)(1) to address the impact of Martinez v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
  Meanwhile, on December 16, 2011, Brinker applied for leave to file a supplemental brief pursuant to Rule of Court 8.520(d) to bring a federal district judge's order to the Court's attention. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:40 am by rhall@initiativelegal.com
The parties’ supplemental briefing presented starkly different interpretations of Brinker’s implications as to predominance, with Judge Fitzgerald finding that, while “the Brinker court did not elaborate on every possible form of common proof that may satisfy a predominance assessment,” the plaintiff in Paige sufficiently “allege[d] the existence of various uniform policies that were consistently applied to purported class members,” and… [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 10:54 am
Evansville, Indiana - Indiana copyright attorneys for Brinker Manufacturing Jewelers, Inc. d/b/a Brinker's Jewelers of Evansville, Indiana (Brinker's) and South Central Communications Corporation d/b/a South Central Digital of Nashville, Tennessee ("South Central Digital") filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in the Southern District of Indiana alleging, inter alia, that Rogers Galleria Jewelers, LLC d/b/a The… [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:36 pm by Matt C. Bailey
I have spent the better part of the morning reviewing and digesting oral argument in Brinker. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 8:46 pm by Dave Wieneke
Six and a half years ago, Scott Brinker started a blog about the intersection of marketing and technology. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:15 am by Andrew Frisch
Plaintiffs agree that no one from Brinker supervised, trained or directed them; no Brinker employees were even present when Plaintiffs worked. [read post]