Search for: "D. Hill v. S. Burks (Majority Opinion)" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” At Rewire.News, Jessica Mason Pieklo argues that Monday’s decision to send Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Burke's dissent but wrote separately to emphasize his concern that the narrow slot carved out in the Vasquez case appeared to be widened by the majority decision in the instant case. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 3:51 am
Burke's dissent but wrote separately to emphasize his concern that the narrow slot carved out in the Vasquez case appeared to be widened by the majority decision in the instant case. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 3:56 am
Burke disagreed with the majority's resolution of the jury panel issue. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 12:57 pm by WSLL
HILL delivered the opinion of the CourtThe concurrence disagreed with the majority regarding the function of the Court to reweigh the Commission’s credibility determinations. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:16 am
Burke special concurrence, joined by D. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 1:46 pm by WSLL
Hill delivered the opinion for the court.J. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant did not seek plain error review or invocation of suspension of the Rules of Appellate Procedure to allow review of the unpreserved claim, and the court declined to review it. (3) The defendant argued that admission of the jail phone call testimony violated Rule 701 of the North Carolina Rules of Evidence as improper lay opinion. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 12:43 pm by Eric
The story started at Kash Hill's Forbes blog, but it appears Forbes spiked the story (at Google's request...?) [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
 Still, it would be foolish to reject Jennifer’s cautionary note tout court, just as it might be a mistake to adopt my old teacher Louis Hartz’s dismissal of Burke as an apostle of “mindless” complacence and acceptance of the status quo. [read post]