Search for: "D.C. Department of Health v. D.C. Department of Employment Services"
Results 1 - 20
of 187
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2013, 2:21 pm
, Michael Sipos and Gary Smith v. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:37 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, a divided panel clarified the scope of the consultant corollary to FOIA Exemption 5. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
The post Court of Appeals Restores DOL Regulation Barring Third-Party Employers from Claiming Exemptions for Companionship and Live-In Domestic Service Workers appeared first on Health Employment And Labor. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 10:29 am
Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 6:56 am
United States Department of Health and Human Services, August 8, 2017, Pillard, N.). [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 7:54 am
Supreme Court Declines to Review DOL Home Care Rule appeared first on Health Employment And Labor. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 5:42 am
Weil, the D.C. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 10:11 am
Lady of Fatima Health Services, Inc., No. 2:22-cv-00278 (E.D. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The D.C. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 2:24 pm
The Indian Health Service is an agency within the Department of Health and Human Services that administers health care programs for Native American tribes. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
The D.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 10:08 am
Several home health care industry groups, including Home Care Association of America, challenged the department’s new rule in court. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 4:09 am
"The Circuit Court pointed out that Ford's employer, The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, was, in its view, a "political subdivision" of New York and thus it is exempt under the definitions of employer set out in 29 USC §152(2).NYPPL Comment: Did Ford have any recourse with respect to her claim that DC-37 breached its duty of fair representation? [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 12:58 pm
Department of Health and Human Services, (DC Cir., Nov. 14, 2014), the unanimous 3-judge panel in an 86-page opinion written by Judge Cornelia Pillard said in part:The regulatory opt out works simply: A religious organization that objects on religious grounds to including coverage for contraception in its health plan may so inform either the entity that issues or administers its group health plan or the Department of Health and… [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 12:44 pm
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is likely to pursue one of two options: (1) request an en banc rehearing of the Halbig case by all active judges on the court; or (2) petition for the case to be heard by the U.S. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 4:05 am
Because the Department of Health and Human Services had announced a one-year enforcement safe harbor for non-profit groups whose religious beliefs are violated by the mandate, the court concluded that the schools do not face imminent enforcement action. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:42 am
The D.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 11:58 am
Discrimination and Employment. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 8:17 am
Although affirming a district court’s grant of summary judgment to an employer in a suit brought by a blind African-American Health and Human Services employee, the D.C. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:51 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s June 28, 2012 National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
