Search for: "DAILY V. STATE"
Results 1 - 20
of 10,404
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2011, 2:07 am
Carvalho v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Omar [2010] EWCA Civ 1406; [2010] WLR (D) 344 “A short term of imprisonment on the part of an EEA worker during his first five years in the United Kingdom meant that the time needed to establish a right permanently to reside had to begin anew after his imprisonment had concluded. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 2:40 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department: R (Kapoor) v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 2:25 am
Persaud v. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:28 am
Edwards v Government of the United States of America [2007] EWHC 1877 (Admin) “In deciding whether there was dual criminality under the Extradition Act 2003, the domestic court was confined to the facts alleged in the offence specified in the extradition request. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:58 am
PO (Nigeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 132; [2011] WLR (D) 61 “The current practice of producing a headnote of the determination of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal in a country guidance case needed to be reviewed. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:56 am
Regina (Boahen) v Secretary of State for the Home Office [2010] EWCA Civ 585; [2010] WLR (D) 143 “An immigration officer at the port of entry had discretionary power to cancel a visa granted overseas on the ground that the purpose of the visit was not same as stated in the visa granted and to refuse leave to enter the UK. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 2:01 am
R (Rowley and others) v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:01 am
” WLR Daily, 3rd July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 359; [2008] WLR (D) 114 “S 35(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State power to override a Parole Board recommendation for the release on parole of a prisoner serving a sentence of more than 15 years, was not compatible with art 5(4) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
1 Aug 2007, 2:38 am
R(A) v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Regina (Parsipoor) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Salih and another) v Same [2011] EWCA Civ 276; [2011] WLR (D) 97 “A claimant in a claim for judicial review was entitled to an oral hearing even where the claims were academic. [read post]
26 Jan 2009, 2:38 am
” WLR Daily, [...] [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 1:58 am
Patel and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 741; [2012] WLR (D) 174 “The decision of the Secretary of State for the Home Department to refuse an extension of leave to remain in the United Kingdom was not invalidated by the fact that she had made no removal direction in respect of the applicant at the same time as or shortly after the refusal of the extension application.” WLR Daily, 1st June 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 2:50 am
R (F (A Child)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R (Thompson) v Same [2010] UKSC 17; [2010] WLR (D) 98 “The indefinite notification requirements for sexual offenders who had been sentenced to 30 months’ imprisonment or more were incompatible with the right to respect for private and family life because they did not contain any mechanism for reviewing the justification for continuing the requirements in individual cases. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP [2010] UKSC 24; [2010] WLR (D) 149 “Conditions in a control order which were proportionate restrictions upon the right to private and family life could nevertheless be decisive in determining that the overall effect of the order amounted to a deprivation of liberty. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 2:32 am
R (F (Mongolia)) v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:18 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 2:19 am
Gibson v. [read post]
