Search for: "DAVID MCCALLUM" Results 21 - 40 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Each Thursday we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
On 23 March 2017 Sir David Eady heard an application in the case of EZE Group Ltd v Taylor Marshall Ltd. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:57 am
You might be smart enough only to see that there's no way for you to have fun or to connect with anyone else and to dither away philosophizing about the value of the fun and connection that has become unavailable to you.You don't want to end up like David McCallum in "The 6th Finger" episode of "The Outer Limits":With the e-bike you have a switch that lets you change your level of assistance up and down. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:00 pm by Kingsley Egbuonu
Mehdi Salmouni-Zerhouni (English website still under construction); Cabinet Aksiman; Morocco Intellectual Property Services; NJQ & Associates; and Saud M A Shawwaf Law Office and Abu Setta & Partners (SMAS-IP);Nigeria: Allan & Ogunkeye; Jackson, Etti & Edu; David Garrick Kayode & Co; O. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:24 pm by INFORRM
Ray Chesterton v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd [2010] NSWSC 982, 1 Sept 2010, McCallum J. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 5:31 pm by INFORRM
  McCallum J is expected to give directions to the four person jury on 30 October 2017. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:59 pm by Rachel Brown, Preston Lim
  On May 15, the Trump administration escalated its feud with the Chinese telecommunications company Huawei by  issuing an executive order that declared a national emergency with respect to telecom infrastructure security and that laid the groundwork for the commerce secretary to prevent U.S. companies from installing any “information and communications technology or services designed, developed, manufactured, or supplied, by persons owned by, controlled by, or subject to the… [read post]
3 Dec 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
The defamation trial in Pannu v Carter was heard on 28 and 29 November 2017 by Sir David Eady   Judgment was reserved. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 5 February 2016 McCallum J gave judgment in the case of Cheikho v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (No.4) [2016] NSWSC 29. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Bateman v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1601 McCallum J struck out a number of contextual imputations in the defence but gave leave to re-plead two of them. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Washington-Carty v Fisher, heard 14 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) David v Hosany,  heard 20, 21 and 24 July 2017 (HHJ Moloney QC) Bukovsky v CPS, heard 5 October 2017 (Gross, Si [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 1:48 am by Seán Binder
David Cohen reports for POLITICO. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
In Liu v The Age Company & Ors ([2010] NSWSC 1176) McCallum J considered an application for preliminary discovery seeking identification of journalists’ sources. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Index editor Jo Glanville chairs a panel featuring Hugh Tomlinson QC, former F1 president Max Mosley, Suzanne Moore and David Price QC, who will discuss gagging orders, tabloid intrusion and the right to a private life. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
It was reported that McCallum’s wife, Sonoma State University President Judy Sakaki, retaliated against a former school provost for reporting complaints by female university employees that McCallum had sexually harassed them during a party at his house. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 16 May 2016 Sir David Eady heard a PTR in the case of Bloor v Beresford. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 7:01 am by Raquel Leslie, Brian Liu
TikTok has come under renewed congressional scrutiny for allegedly deceptive data privacy practices. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 12:42 am by INFORRM
Counsel David Sherborne told the judge that the cases brought against Mirror Group Newspapers were “exceptional”, compared to other privacy actions. [read post]