Search for: "DAVIS v. DAVIS"
Results 81 - 100
of 8,961
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
From Massachusetts judge Brian Davis's opinion Monday in Smith v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:47 am
IP law might not be a high-risk first-year module where PAL can boost pass rates, but in a final year an improved student performance can impact positively on degree classification.Technology and innovative methods to incorporate into our teaching is addressed in Part V. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
Biggs claimed that despite the act’s passage, US Attorney General Merrick Garland told Marshals to “avoid arresting protestors” at the homes of multiple Supreme Court Justices after a leaked copy of the court’s proposed ruling in the abortion rights case Dobbs v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:00 pm
In a part of Bush v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 12:24 pm
Davis, 737 So. 2d 1170, 1172 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999) (quoting Dep’t of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:51 am
” The timeframe for decision in Trump v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
After a divorce, people move on. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 1:07 am
In Guerra v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
The relevant precedent would be Arizona v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[This is the second installment in a series about the oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Stay tuned.The post Attending Oral Argument in <i>Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 9:36 am
Lash's response to the Amar brothers' amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
While Davis was on the SJC, the court issued advisory opinions on two of the most explosive issues in American politics: Black voting rights after Dred Scott v. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 7:47 pm
Jefferson Davis: President of the United States? [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
An excerpt from today's Appellate Court of Connecticut decision in Ambrose v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 5:36 pm
It’s the Supreme Court’s biggest election test since Bush v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The short version is that it’s a stone-cold loser, not least because it would have absurd ramifications (such as that it would mean Jefferson Davis would’ve been disqualified from serving in virtually any federal or state office except the presidency and vice-presidency, and that the Foreign Emoluments Clause wouldn’t prohibit the President, Vice-President, and members of Congress from accepting titles, offices, gifts or emoluments from foreign… [read post]