Search for: "DAVIS v. KANE"
Results 1 - 20
of 30
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2018, 8:19 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
Davis v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
In Weksler v Kane Kessler, P.C. ;2009 NY Slip Op 04957 ;Decided on June 16, 2009 ;Appellate Division, First Department we see the fatal duo of lack of privity and lack of proximity. [read post]
1 May 2012, 2:42 am
In Sun Graphics Corp. v Levy, Davis & Maher, LLP 2012 NY Slip Op 03273 Decided on April 26, 2012 Appellate Division, First Department we are not told the facts behind the decision, but the decision is clear. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 9:06 pm
” See Davis v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
24 Dec 2016, 8:19 am
State v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 1:01 am
Mangini of Stark & Stark in the firm's New Jersey Law Blog Court reduces $25 million verdict against hospital, denies motion for new trial - Charleston lawyer Jeffrey V. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 10:31 am
See Davis v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 1:06 am
Lamb of Valorem Law Group at his blog, In Search of Perfect Client Service Make Every Effort to Recession Proof Your Law Firm - Legal marketing expert Tom Kane at his Legal Marketing Blog Citigroup v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm
In the Courts On 13 January 2014, Nicola Davies J adjourned the application in the case of Styles v Photographer AAA and others to a CMC on 10 March 2014. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
ELLIOTT, AND KANE RUSSELL, COLEMAN & LOGAN, P.C.; from Dallas County; 5th district (05-05-01013-CV, 241 SW3d 689, 12-13-07)08-0084 MCALLEN HOSPITALS, L.P., ET AL. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
Inasmuch as the Attorney General's office was not an agency involved in the FOIL request, and is without authority to grant relief requested by petitioner, the Attorney General is not a proper party herein (see Matter of Davis v Evans, 97 AD3d 857, 858 [3d Dept 2012]; Matter of Abreu v Hogan, 72 AD3d 1143, 1144 [3d Dept 2010], appeal dismissed 15 NY3d 836 [2010]). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:45 am
Judge Kane in Hanway v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Emody v. [read post]
13 Dec 2006, 7:17 pm
Davis, Keesha Davis, Matthew T. [read post]
26 May 2015, 7:42 am
In the latter category we place Newman v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 5:27 pm
Resolved complaints since our last round up include: [Week commencing 20 August]: Mr Wayne Jenkins v The Sunday Times, Clause 1, 24/08/2012; Mr Adam Wood v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Frank Kane v Newtownards Chronicle, Clause 3, 23/08/2012; Mr Serge Voronov v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v Daily Mirror, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Mr Oliver Gray v The Daily Telegraph, Clause 1, 23/08/2012; Linda… [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 3:28 am
” For this blog, Amy Howe has an overview of Kavanaugh’s record here, while closer looks at the judge’s record on campaign finance, and on a law-review article about presidential power, come from Charles Davis, here, and Kevin Russell, here. [read post]
