Search for: "DAVIS v. PUBLIC DEFENDERS et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2007, 1:58 pm
Frederick Motz.In response to a pro se action, State defendants filed a motion to dismiss or for summary judgment and were granted the motion to dismiss.The Court found that Davis' claims arose out of a peer review process in which defendants were engaged, and the law is clear that to the extent Davis was seeking monetary damages against defendants, all of them were entitled to absolute immunity in connection with their peer review… [read post]
17 Nov 2012, 6:19 pm
The Estate of Bette Davis et al v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:48 am
CDW Corporation et al., 6-07-cv-00511 (TXED March 18, 2010, Memorandum Opinion & Order) (Davis, J.) [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 6:00 am
FX Networks, et al, BC667011 (Superior Ct. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 4:05 pm
Carrier IQ et al., CV 12-01562 GAF (NRWx) (C.D. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 9:46 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 9:05 pm
Deutsche Telekom AG et al Soundview Publications, Inc. et al v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 10:13 am
Tippmann Enterprises, et al. , a 6-page opinion, Judge Darden writes:ISSUE: Whether Wells Fargo Bank owed a duty to Bowman to clear ice and snow from the sidewalk adjacent to its property. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Rowland, et. al.) [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 7:04 am
Davis v. [read post]
9 Oct 2007, 6:24 pm
Bredesen, et al [read post]
21 Sep 2007, 11:35 pm
Bredesen, et al [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 7:52 am
Public Disclosure: The disclosure of facts must be public. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:11 pm
The second claim sues under the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), contending that the properties at issue do not contain, in areas comprising "public accommodations," e.g., leasing offices, parking lots, sidewalks, and restrooms, certain features of minimum accessibility and adaptable design as required by law.Equity responded with a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for improper venue. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 6:00 am
” # # # The Case Against Kramer, et al. [read post]
25 May 2007, 8:50 am
Maric Piping, Inc., et al., 171 Misc.2d 429 (Sup. [read post]
8 May 2008, 12:01 pm
Davis v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
The case is Capitol Records Inc., et. al. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Ulrich Kranz et al. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 5:00 pm
Abdullahi et al. [read post]
