Search for: "DC v. Exxon Mobil Corporation"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
[8] Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corporation (DC Cir, 8 July 2011) slip op, page 50 (Rogers J) [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., No. 09-7125 (D.C. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., 09-7125, July 8, 2011, the DC Circuit, in a 2-1 decision, held that corporations could in fact be sued. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
by Kenneth Anderson It's likely old news to most OJ readers, but we should still note in passing that the DC Circuit, in a divided panel, handed down an important ATS case, John Doe VIII v Exxon Mobil Corp. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 10:24 am
Exxon Mobil Corp., No. 09-7125 (D.C. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 10:12 am
For example, argued the SEC senior counsel, you can't aggregate an Exxon/Mobil project with a Shell project that may sit, for example, on the other side of Turkmenistan. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
DC-16-139-C, Honorable Ana Lisa Garza, Judge Presiding. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Guthrie and Cravath The era of the white-shoe lawyer arguably began on May 1, 1899, when Paul Cravath, then a 37-year-old corporate lawyer lateraled into the Seward law firm, thus becoming the law partner of 40-year-old William Guthrie in the firm that would eventually evolve into Cravath Swaine & Moore. [read post]
