Search for: "DEAR v. WYETH"
Results 1 - 20
of 64
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2019, 6:21 am
Casto’s article “Dear Sister Antillico …”: The Story of Kirksey v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 10:10 am
Wyeth, LLC, 2016 WL 1719550 (N.D. [read post]
24 Dec 2015, 8:20 am
We let Avandia have it here.Guvenoz v. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 5:00 am
Not quite two years ago, we posted about how, under Wyeth v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Wyeth, 894 A.2d 141, 145, 149-50 (Pa. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:16 am
By relying on Wyeth v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 1:34 pm
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, 797 F. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 1:26 pm
The supporting citations are only from Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 5:00 am
Wyeth, Inc., 850 N.W.2d 353 (Iowa 2014). [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
Wyeth, Inc. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:30 am
The article sent us into a reverie of wishful thinking about ‘correcting’ the Wyeth v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 11:58 am
Although Czimmer v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 11:31 am
Wyeth, 74 Pa. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
See Strayhorn v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
These range from claims that the warnings should have been bolded and boxed (almost always preempted, as we discussed here) to claims that the warnings should have been supplemented with “Dear Doctor” letters (which we discussed here). [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
Pfizer, Inc., 712 F.3d 21 (1st Cir. 2013), Aetna, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Jan. 7, 2013) (use of “Dear Doctor” letters; opinions contrary to learned intermediary rule); Lemons v. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 5:01 am
Wyeth LLC, 2013 WL 878586 (S.D. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:25 am
Wyeth, ___ F.3d ___, No. 12-13263, slip op. (11th Cir. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm
All the while Maya v. [read post]
