Search for: "DIAMOND v. US "
Results 81 - 100
of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2022, 7:13 am
The secretary of state can direct airport operators to detain Russian aircraft in U.K. airspace and the CAA may refuse, suspend or revoke permissions for Russian aircraft; and[v] Luxury goods: Other measures include a ban on the export of high-end luxury goods to Russia and higher import tariffs on key Russian goods. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 2:05 am
The Complainant in Red Bull GmbH v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
That conclusion seems to be based on a mistaken application of the US Supreme Court opinion in Garcetti v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:30 am
Diamond A Hunting, Inc., 2012 WL 3206587 (5th Cir. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 5:55 am
Trott's Woodproducts, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 6:10 am
Diamond v. [read post]
6 Jun 2009, 9:07 pm
The last time the Supreme Court took up patentability was in 1981, in Diamond v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:43 pm
In Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 2:43 pm
In Diamond Z Trailer, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:14 am
It appears in a location often used for ornamentation in this industry.The Board concluded that applicant's repeating diamond pattern is not inherently distinctive. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 5:48 pm
In Music Group Macao Commercial Offshore Ltd v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 4:59 am
In the case of URBN US Retail LLC v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 7:09 am
The more I read yesterday's Supreme Court’s decision in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
So when an unpermitted party chooses to use the word Tiffany in conjunction with its sale of diamond rings, consumer confusion is almost inevitable. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 9:06 am
Yesterday was the 30th Anniversary of Diamond v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 3:24 am
Broadbanding of positions Ensley v Diamond, 258 AD2d 263, Leave to appeal denied 93 NY2d 814 The Ensley case contrasts two different position classification concepts: (1) “reclassification” of positions and (2) “broadbanding” of positions. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:23 pm
In Horowitch v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 2:32 pm
In S.D. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 9:25 pm
He contends that the officers should have used a diamond or carbide-bladed saw, which would have resulted in less damage to the garage floor. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 4:56 am
This distinction was expressed incredibly well by David Kappos for SCOTUSBlog: "[t]he distinction between patentable software in Diamond v. [read post]
