Search for: "DIAMOND v. US " Results 121 - 140 of 1,058
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2009, 3:36 pm
Pa. 2007) (finding trademark use in sponsored linking); Buying for the Home, LLC v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm
For example, when asked how she remembers things that may be important to her in the future, she replied, ‘I have a diamond ring with an iPad inside it. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 10:00 am
So observes Katfriend and occasional contributor Kevin Winters, pointing to a recent Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, decision of Judge Hacon in Helme & Others v Maher & Another [2015] EWHC 3151 (IPEC) . [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:16 pm by Jani
The machine-to-transformation is not, according to the US Supreme Court, the only definitive test, but more of "...a useful and important clue, an investigative tool, for determining whether some claimed inventions are processes under §101".Gavin always thought in the abstractThe majority's decision hinged heavily on its previous decisions of Gottschalk v Benson, Parker v Flook and Diamond v Diehr. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:30 am by Eric Guttag
The reasoning in Mayo Collaborative Services makes no patent law logical sense on numerous grounds, including disregarding an important paragraph in the Supreme Court’s 1981 case of Diamond v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 8:00 am by Sean Wajert
Blue Diamond Growers, No. 1:19-cv-08993 (S.D. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 11:51 am by Eric Goldman
Blue Diamond My 2018 Comments to the FDA The post Louisiana’s Anti-Vegan Law Constitutionally Enjoined–Tofurky v. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:18 am
In the Wake of the Plague is Norman Cantor's entry in the Be-the-Next-Jared-Diamond! [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 1:15 pm by Megan Bannigan
’s $25 million summary judgment win against Costco Wholesale Corp. in a dispute over Costco’s use of the word “Tiffany” to identify a specific type of six-prong diamond ring setting in Tiffany and Co. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:34 pm
  Harry Winston Inc. and Harry Winston S.A. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 2:39 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Court held that the intention of the Facilities Grant was to confer a property right in the form of an easement, and that this was a single comprehensive right to use a complex of facilities as they evolved. [read post]