Search for: "DICK v. STATE"
Results 61 - 80
of 558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2021, 8:50 pm
The State not only urges us to answer that question in the negative, but it also requests that we wholly abandon the proportionality framework from State v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:25 am
In Miami Herald v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Dick Durbin, D-Ill. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:01 am
–State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
The United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) is but one example. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
Dept. of Ins. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 7:15 am
There are massive variations in chapter 7 vs. 13 filing rates by state—some states have a 7 culture and some have a 13 culture. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 12:46 pm
In Cantlon v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 4:27 pm
The much anticipated judgment in Depp v News Group Newspapers ([2020] EWHC 2911 (QB)) was handed down on 2 November 2020. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 1:48 pm
” (Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 1:36 pm
In Jones v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
7 May 2020, 12:13 pm
As Dick Clark presciently recognized on American Bandstand, the song is “a little unusual, a little strange,” and so is the dispute in Everly v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
Dick Durbin in mid-March, would amend the Senate rules to allow senators to vote remotely using any technology certified as “reliable and secure” by the secretary of the Senate, sergeant-at-arms and director of the doorkeepers if the Senate majority and minority leaders or their designees jointly determine that “an extraordinary crisis of national extent exists in which it would be infeasible for Senators to cast their votes in person. [read post]
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
