Search for: "DILLON v. STATE" Results 61 - 80 of 333
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2020, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Rick Snyder (and former State Treasurer Andy Dillon) are off the hook for discovery as parties while their qualified immunity defenses wind through the courts. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Nonetheless, the ERA did not achieve 38 ratifications, or three-fourths of the states as required by Article V, by the extended deadline in 1982. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:48 am by SHG
The case of the 27th Amendment, which was proposed with no time limit and did not reach the requisite number of states until more than two centuries later, suggests that contemporaneous “meeting of the minds” is not so intrinsic a feature of the amendment process as many legal scholars once assumed; on the other hand, a 1921 Supreme Court case, Dillon v. [read post]
30 Jan 2020, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
The case of the 27th Amendment, which was proposed with no time limit and did not reach the requisite number of states until more than two centuries later, suggests that contemporaneous “meeting of the minds” is not so intrinsic a feature of the amendment process as many legal scholars once assumed; on the other hand, a 1921 Supreme Court case, Dillon v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
As Dean Amar noted in his column, in the 1921 case of Dillon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Everyone agrees that Congress can put a ratification deadline into the text of an amendment (Dillon v. [read post]
22 Jun 2019, 6:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The Nebraska Supreme Court took the same view: "A jury has yet to determine whether Sullivan's allegations about Dillon and his business practices are false or misleading representations of fact. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dillon v Peak Envtl., LLC  2019 NY Slip Op 04548  Decided on June 7, 2019  Appellate Division, Fourth Department is the story of an upstate commercial case which went through a lot of procedural wrangling, up to the Appellate Division, with little forward movement. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  The letter stated that petitioner would “be responsible for providing instruction to students assigned to [i]n-[s]chool [s]uspension. [read post]