Search for: "DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. K.M." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Parents have a constitutionally protected right to maintain a relationship with their children; however, that right is not absolute, and must be balanced against the State’s responsibility to protect the welfare of children
9 Nov 2011, 2:55 pm by PaulKostro
Law Lessons from New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
APPELLATE DIVISION SEEKS TO PROTECT THE PARENTAL BOND
30 Dec 2013, 12:40 pm by Robert A. Epstein
  Shortly thereafter, the Division of Child Protection and Permanency (DCPP) issued a letter concluding that the allegations of abuse against Steve were substantiated, but it took no further action. [read post]
NJ Family Legal Blog - http://njfamilylaw.foxrothschild.com/