Search for: "DIVISION OF CHILD PROTECTION AND PERMANENCY v. S.C."
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 11:38 am
Bryan, 296 S.C. 305, 372 S.E.2d 116, 119 (Ct.App. 1988). [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 8:10 am
Additionally, the Family Court properly included the children as protected persons on the order of protection, as the evidence demonstrated that doing so was “necessary to further the purposes of protection” (Family Ct Act § 842[l]; see Matter of Lengiewicz v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 3:44 am
How long does a child have to be in a third party’s physical possession before the Moore v. [read post]
