Search for: "DOE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE et al" Results 21 - 40 of 141
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Outside of this directive, the agencies generally have taken the view that prior enforcement of the antitrust laws was too lax and that the narrow focus on more traditional antitrust harms (such as higher prices, reduced output, or lower quality) has been too narrow. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am by Kevin Kaufman
This analysis shows, however, that consumption does not disappear, and that revenue from taxes on tobacco products is rarely used to offset harm caused by that consumption. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Russell Wheeler
Dominion et al (April 2021) and later assessed significant attorneys’ fees.) [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
The amicus briefs cite the Donahue Study for two main points. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am by Richard Hunt
SHC Laguna Niguel I, LLC et al, 2021 WL 2165208 (C.D. [read post]
6 May 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Tyson Foods Inc. et al is still going to have value, though. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
First up will be the ACA's defenders, the intervenor states (California, et al.) and the House of Representatives, followed by the Solicitor General and the plaintiffs. [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
KENNETH KAYSER, et al., Appellees. : : : Case No. 3:19-cv-00363 : : Judge Thomas M. [read post]