Search for: "DOE v. ATTORNEY GENERAL, MAINE et al" Results 101 - 120 of 141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
__________________________ [1] Redish et al., supra note 2 at 644-646. [2] See e.g., Bisaillon v. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am by Ben
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 1:40 pm by Adam C. Ragan
The result was a hodgepodge of conflicting opinions and at least four main treatments described by then-Judge Barrett in Gadelhak v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 1:32 pm by Chris Martin
  Excess Underwriters at Lloyd's, London et al vs Frank's Casing, 246 S.W. 42 (Tex. 2008). [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 9:48 pm by David M. McLain
Consistent with published insurance industry policy interpretive materials allegedly contradicting the insurers’ coverage position in Greystone,19 an insurance industry attorney and lobbyist testified during the legislative hearings that General Security and Greystone were a "shock" to the insurance industry and "not the rule of law," "not the way courts have ruled in other jurisdictions," and that the rulings "took it too far. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
   Defending those provisions and arguing first will be Solicitor General Donald B. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper patent to… [read post]