Search for: "DOE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A." Results 1 - 20 of 154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 6:00 am
Bank of America, N.A., ___ Cal.App.4th ___ (Jan. 21, 2009), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Three) held that Labor Code "section 203 penalties may not be recovered as restitution under Business and Professions Code section 17203. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Bank of America, N.A., 247 Cal.App.4th 1110 (May 31, 2016), more than 200 plaintiffs from California and other states brought UCL and other claims against numerous lenders and loan servicers related to the handling of their home mortgages. [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General to file a brief expressing the views of the United States in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 6:55 am by Edward M. McNally
Bank of America N.A., C.A. 5219-VCL (May 14, 2010) This is an intesting case even though it deals with how to interpret a complicated indenture. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 7:00 am by Daniel O'Rielly
MBNA America Bank, N.A., the California Supreme Court held that the National Bank Act (NBA) preempts California Civil Code section 1748.9, which requires that credit card issuers make certain disclosures on so-called convenience checks. [read post]
16 Sep 2018, 12:40 pm by Wolfgang Demino
Fort Worth Court of Appeals affirms take-nothing judgment entered against credit card issuer in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 5:02 pm
Bank of America, N.A., 170 Cal.App.4th 388, 390 (2009) (discussed in this blog post). [read post]