Search for: "DOE v. CARE ONE, LLC et al" Results 1 - 20 of 288
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Kapadia Introduction On March 24, 2022, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”) issued a much-anticipated decision in Patel, et al. v. 7-Eleven, Inc., et al. answering a certified question from the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit concerning the application of the Massachusetts independent contractor law (“ICL”) to franchise relationships. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:03 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit in Belmora LLC v Bayer Consumer Care AG, et al., Appeal No. 15-1335 (4th Cir. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 9:53 am
RE/MAX FIRST CHOICE, LLC, et al., Defendants. [read post]
1 Jan 2012, 3:14 pm by Michael Kline
The Order of Judge Richard Smoak in a recent Federal District Court case (Opis Management, LLC, et. al. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am by Blue Blog
In a case decided on November 17, Inland Atlantic Old National Phase I, LLC et. al. v. 6425 Old National, LLC, the Fourth Division Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled on fiduciary duties owed under joint venture agreements, applied rules of contract construction, and briefly addressed substantial versus strict compliance. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am by Blue Blog
In a case decided on November 17, Inland Atlantic Old National Phase I, LLC et. al. v. 6425 Old National, LLC, the Fourth Division Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled on fiduciary duties owed under joint venture agreements, applied rules of contract construction, and briefly addressed substantial versus strict compliance. [read post]