Search for: "DOE v. RUMSFELD et al"
Results 21 - 40
of 45
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
Moreover, Padilla’s claims against Rumsfeld et al. may fall on more sympathetic ears in the Fourth Circuit, which narrowly divided on the legality of domestic military detention in the al-Marri litigation and issued a blistering rebuke to government for its handling of Padilla’s habeas case. [read post]
2 May 2012, 11:43 am
Rumsfeld, et al., docket 11-1277; a post discussing that appeal is here). [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 7:42 pm
Courthouse Habashi, et al., v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 7:54 am
Both of the rulings — Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Rumsfeld. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:41 am
Al-Nashiri’s case, one sees that the government does not offer the William Murphy precedent and other conspiracy military commissions in this way. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 10:22 am
Arkansas Times LP v Mark Waldrip, et al, No. 19-1378 (8th Circuit, 2022). [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:00 am
Rumsfeld [16] and Burt v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:52 pm
Both new briefs were filed in Rasul, et al., v. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 10:00 am
During two days of nonclassified argumentation, the defendants in U.S. v Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. argued that the government has delayed, denied, and/or destroyed discovery documents. [read post]
7 May 2019, 12:35 pm
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Claiborne Hardware Co. (1982), while the state argued that Rumsfeld v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 6:21 am
Khalid Shaikh Mohammad et al. reconvened for pretrial proceedings, meeting in open session on July 23 and 25, and in closed sessions on July 24 and 26. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
Rumsfeld, et al. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 1:02 am
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 16, 2012 Decided January 22, 2013 No. 11-1265 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Rumsfeld, 124 S Ct 2633 (2004) will serve to provide context to these notions. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 3:58 pm
Supreme Court in Hamdan v. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 5:34 am
Leight and Associates, Inc., et al., Case No. 20-2279 (6th Cir. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 1:11 am
A Lot of Reporters Must Be Calling Al Qaeda (May 15, 2006)101. [read post]
