Search for: "DOE v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2017, 6:44 pm
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (D DC, Dec. 8, 2017), the DC federal district court upheld advertising Guidelines of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority which, among other things, bar transit vehicle ads "that promote or oppose any religion, religious practice or belief. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:23 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the plaintiff Veronica Tinsley was at the Cheverly Metro Station in Maryland when she slipped and fell on the wet platform. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, (DC Cir., July 31, 2018), the D.C. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Area Transit Auth., 2020 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 6:22 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 11:13 am
Yet a D.C. district court has upheld a Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority exclusion that was nearly identical to the one struck down in Rosenberger. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:38 pm
Metropolitan Area Transit Authority The facts of the case are rather simple. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 7:31 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455 Issues: (1) Whether the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority’s policy of refusing to accept advertisements that promote or oppose religion or reflect a religious perspective violates the First Amendment; and (2) whether that discrimination against religious speech violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:00 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, March 10, 2015, Motz, D.). [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 3:39 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 2006 WL 890679 at * 5 (D.D.C.2006)(the privilege is “rarely recognized. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:10 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
(citing Bowen v. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 10:41 am
Washington, fails to protect the Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and the 14th Amendment right to due process when, in death-penalty cases involving flagrantly deficient performance, courts can deny relief following a truncated “no prejudice” analysis that does not account for the evidence amassed in a habeas proceeding and relies on a trial recor [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
District Court held than an employee of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority could, pursuant to the Rehabilitation Act [29 U.S.C. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
” However, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, known as WMATA, rejected the advertisement because of its religious nature. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Apparently not wanting to be on the sidelines, the Washington Area Metropolitan Transit Authority has gotten in on the act, not only on the subway line, but on busses, too. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am
Buccola’s work, with Alison Buccola, provides as convincing as argument – better than, say, James Bradley Thayer’s defense of Gelpcke v. [read post]
