Search for: "DOES 1 - 42 v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP "
Results 41 - 60
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Section 3 of the Representation of the People Act 1983 remains unamended by the rulings in Hirst v United Kingdom (No 2) (2006) 42 EHRR 849 and Greens and MT v United Kingdom (23 November 2010) that it offends against Article 3 Protocol 1 by imposing a blanket ban on prisoners from participating in elections. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:16 pm
Sibelius v. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 11:06 pm
Citing the parties' diversity of citizenship, FedEx removed the suit to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 2:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
Beyond these two strands, we were introduced to the great modern structures of law making in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm
[v] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1041. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm
[v] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1041. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 1:08 pm
[v] DeGenaro, supra note 1, at 1041. [read post]
15 May 2012, 12:08 pm
This condition is considered satisfied if: (1) it is the agency’s policy or practice not to enforce the departure of aliens in a particular category; or (2) it appears that the federal immigration agency is permitting the alien to reside in the United States indefinitely. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Citizenship and Immigration Services within DHS. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:23 am
” Thus, as the Solicitor General explainedto the Supreme Court in the recent United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
“Social Responsibility” is now part of the new Geneva Bar Association Professional Code of Conduct which comes into force on 1 February 2018. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:50 am
These philosophies also found their way into the controversial 2010 SCOTUS decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Existing democracies are fragile.[3] That includes the United States. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 7:19 am
United States 16-309 Issue: Whether the U.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 2:29 pm
First, it does not represent the solution to a duty owed to the government as a condition of citizenship. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 7:52 am
(D) Whether a party has strong familial, emotional, or cultural ties to another state or country, including foreign citizenship. [read post]
