Search for: "DOES 1 - 42 v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP "
Results 61 - 80
of 87
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
(b) Approved forms.(1) Contested actions. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 8:05 pm
Washington presents a similarly discrete issue about claims brought in state court under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 7:28 am
Bouarfa petitioned United States Citizenship and Immigration Services for a visa that would permit her husband to remain in the country permanently. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:45 am
As stated, the rules require one intending to apply for asylum to first obtain an appointment. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
Part V then considers the governance implications of the market activities of the NSWF. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 4:35 pm
Decisions this Week United StatesDominion v. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am
United States, 16-309). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
[v] U.S. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 4:22 am
And the primary way of doing this, according to the Council Recommendation, is to cultivate those competences which are necessary for employability, personal fulfilment, active citizenship and social inclusion. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:00 am
Nationality and Citizenship. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
Citizenship & Immigration Services (“USCIS”). [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:05 am
[[Page 18946]] An F-1 student in post-completion OPT, therefore, does not have to leave the United States within 60 days after graduation, but is authorized to remain in t [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
Introduction What is the proper scope of state power and its agent the public lawyer in Criminal law? [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
The United States ratified the Hague Convention in 1988, and the Convention was implemented by the International Child Abduction Remedies Act (ICARA), 42 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 11:29 am
See United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:44 am
DOJ considered Sandoz’s full timely cooperation with the United States’ investigation on other generic drug manufacturers, and that a conviction would have likely resulted in Sandoz’s mandatory exclusion from all federal healthcare programs under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 2:40 pm
What’s additionally shocking here: the statutory provision does not actually give the executive branch expulsion authority. [read post]
