Search for: "DOES 1-10, inclusive" Results 101 - 120 of 2,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2020, 11:13 am by Daniel Shaviro
How much of a difference does it make, to those of us in the bottom 99%, how equally or unequally spouses in the top, say, 1% or .1% or .01% "share" their income or wealth? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:48 am by Patricia Hughes
One doctor believes that the term encompasses 10 years. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 8:15 am
Decisions regarding inclusion in the workshop program will be sent by 15 May, 2015. [read post]
  For example, on 6 October 2017, the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA), published a revised version of its Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-1 “Corporate Governance of Locally Incorporated Authorized Institutions” (SPM CG-1). [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:01 am by Administrator
It’s a summary of all Appeals, Oral Judgments and Leaves to Appeal granted from April 10 – May 21, 2021 inclusive. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:13 pm by Laura Orr
A little Halloween "Law" for everyone: 1) "Top 3 Halloween Lawsuits of All Time," by Stephanie Rabiner, 10/25/11, Findlaw 2) Stambovsky v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 7:20 am by John Jascob
Because the previous bright-line 10 percent shareholder ownership test was both over- and under-inclusive, it has been replaced with a "significant influence" test. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am by Robert Chesney
I would just ask that they tidy things up, using 1621(g)(1) to actually amend 10 U.S.C. [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:24 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In the absence of a test method in the patent for determining the anti-adherence of a material, the skilled person is unable to establish, even qualitatively, suitable materials from the extensive group of materials listed in claim 1 which will meet the claimed anti-adherence.1.4 Still further, claim 1 does not limit the amount of anti-adherent material to be included in the composition such that this can range from a fraction of 1% to approaching 100%, this… [read post]
9 May 2018, 12:24 am by Sander van Rijnswou
In the absence of a test method in the patent for determining the anti-adherence of a material, the skilled person is unable to establish, even qualitatively, suitable materials from the extensive group of materials listed in claim 1 which will meet the claimed anti-adherence.1.4 Still further, claim 1 does not limit the amount of anti-adherent material to be included in the composition such that this can range from a fraction of 1% to approaching 100%, this… [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 7:30 pm by Listeria Lawyer
David Mackay, President & CEO Kellogg Company 1 Kellogg Square Battle Creek, MI 49017 WARNING LETTER (10-ATL-07) Dear Mr. [read post]