Search for: "DOLE v. DOLE"
Results 1 - 20
of 609
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2017, 8:25 pm
In 2012, Plaintiff Chad Brazil filed a consumer class action against Dole, alleging that the labels on a total of 38 varieties of Dole’s packaged fruit misleadingly describe the products as “all natural,” despite Dole’s use of artificial ingredients, including chemical preservatives synthetic citric acid and ascorbic acid. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
Prior to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Loper Bright Industries v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 9:36 am
Brazil v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 11:56 am
In November 2007, the jury in Tellez v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 7:02 am
WARF v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
At issue in the case, essentially, was whether the extraordinarily successful Bayh-Dole legislation (enacted in 1980) automatically vested ownership of patent rights in Universities when the underlying research was federally funded. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:52 am
"Chevron or Dole in King v Burwell? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:31 am
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stanford v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:31 am
This morning the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Stanford v. [read post]
12 Aug 2015, 9:09 am
<> Tobias Chavez v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:36 pm
In University of South Florida Board of Trustees v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Dole Packaged Foods, LLC, 2016 WL 5539863 (9th Cir. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 4:10 pm
The trial lawyers were able to trick the Tellez v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 11:07 am
See, e.g., Hasty v. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 12:49 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
Univ. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2009, 12:01 pm
After the case of Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 9:37 am
In Stanford v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 1:42 pm
Three events boosted our economic turnaround in the 1980's: the passage of Bayh-Dole, which injected the incentives of patent ownership into the federal R&D system; the enactment of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which insured the courts would apply the patent law consistently; and the Supreme Court's ruling in Diamond v Chakraberty that living organisms could be patented. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 8:23 am
University v. [read post]
