Search for: "DOT v. Office of Open Records (Majority Opinion)"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2010, 11:14 am
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/826196.co1.pdf State v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
On June 24, 2021, in Leaders of a Beautiful Struggle v Baltimore Police Department,[1] the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit On Rehearing En Blanc decided that Baltimore’s use of an aerial surveillance pilot program violated the Fourth Amendment.[2] The court remanded the matter for further proceedings consistent with the opinion. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:17 am
Under U.S. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 8:38 am
As a result, websites may not be able to wait for takedown notices for pre-1972 sound recordings, nor can websites easily tell if a sound recording is pre- or post-1972. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 6:59 pm
The other arguments on appeal were not reconsidered in the majority opinion. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
She asked how the recent Major Questions Doctrine ruling in West Virginia v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am
(relisted after the February 24, March 3, March 17, March 24, March 31, April 13, April 21 and April 28 conferences) Dot Foods, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am
Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit sua sponte consolidated the appeals en banc and affirmed by a one-vote margin, with no opinion garnering a majority of the judges on the Second Amendment issue. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 3:54 am
Citations in the post are to that list and to paragraph numbers in the Communication.Index to Issues and AnnexPresumed illegalDue process at sourceLegal competence v practical competenceDue process v quality standardsManifest illegality v contextual informationIllegality on the face of the statute v prosecutorial discretionOffline v onlineMore is better, faster is bestLiability shield v removal toolNational laws v coherent EU… [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 8:04 am
That is, it has opened the possibilities to theories of endogenous democracy. [read post]
5 Sep 2008, 11:01 pm
& Ors v Deisel Spa and Case C-302/08 Zino Davidoff SA v Bendesfinanzdirektion Sudost: (Class 46), EPO Boards of Appeal finds that when a fax is transmitted and an ‘OK’ is noted by the sender, this is evidence that the transmission was successful: (IPKat), Professor Hugenholtz slams European Commission for ignoring evidence on copyright extension: (Techdirt) Germany Federal Patent Court publishes guidelines on colour trade mark Signal Yellow:… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
CPSC 2008 Performance and Accountability Report, November 2008) Meanwhile, traffic fatalities in the United States have fallen to record lows. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Circuit Court of Appeals, Published Opinion, April 2, 2010 The published opinion. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 1:25 am
When you find yourself checking “YES” on robo-signing… when you’re a bank that chooses to open a fraud and forgery department… well, something has left the building, let’s say that. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
Attorney’s office says Robb Feedyard pleaded guilty to violating the Clean Water Act and agreed to pay the fines and penalties. [read post]
