Search for: "DOUGLAS v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA"
Results 1 - 20
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Another multi-district litigation (MDL) has hit a jarring speed bump. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
Smith has explained, under District of Columbia v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In Frederick Douglas Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
" Planned Parenthood of Columbia/Willamette, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
The District of Columbia’s Brokerage Act required JLL to obtain the written consent of all clients on both sides. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 2:06 pm
Columbia Falls Aluminum Company, LLC v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
District of Columbia, 35 F.4th 870 (D.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit delicately put it – “property owned by the United States government. [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:54 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
14 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
At the time this wasn’t a serious problem in the District of Columbia but with the expansion of government employment during and after World War I (and the extension of the federal pension system), it became one as a really large proportion of the District’s population was disqualified. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:16 am
District Court for the District of Columbia concluded that the measure was “arbitrary and capricious” and had been implemented in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 9:21 pm
District Court for the Western District of Washington; Mary Saunders of ANSI; Peter L. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
As Locke v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
”); Douglas M. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
Deshaney v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
City of Columbia, 305 F.3d 314, 323 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc). [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
For example, the authors’ analysis of District of Columbia v Heller (2008), a case that addressed whether a ban on handguns violated the Second Amendment right to “keep and bear arms,” reveals that both the majority and dissenting views rely on “pragmatic enrichment” of the text to resolve ambiguity. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Indeed, this bias from inadequate control of confounding infects several pending pharmaceutical multi-district litigations. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 4:07 pm
Circuit’s hearing in Trump v. [read post]
