Search for: "DRIVER v. STATE OF ARKANSAS"
Results 1 - 20
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2011, 1:12 pm
In Douglas v. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 2:57 pm
The lawsuit, Douglas, et al. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm
What if someone in Mesquite, Garland, Keller, Flower Mound, Haslet, Newark, Benbrook, Hutchins, Dallas, Fort Worth, Arlington, Grand Prairie, or Rockwall is involved in an accident with a driver from Arkansas or some other state? [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
A federal court has certified a class of Arkansas drivers alleging that the defendant purchased their personal information from a database maintained by the state, in violation of the Driver’s Privacy Protection Act (DPPA). [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
The report has the two traveling in opposite directions and meeting at a 90-degree turn on V-64 where it meets 275th Street. [read post]
Ford Motor Company v. Washington (Ford III): The Third Time Is Not the Charm (and it ain’t over yet)
5 Jun 2013, 10:10 am
(citing Thomas v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 12:27 pm
Bronni, solicitor general of Arkansas, argues remotely for petitioner (Art Lien) The justices heard argument on Tuesday in Rutledge v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2007, 7:59 am
The statute does provide for different penalties depending on whether (1) the person is a resident of Arkansas with a valid state driver's license, (2) the person is a resident of Arkansas without a valid state driver's license, and (3) the person is not a resident of Arkansas. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 8:38 am
In the case of Curtis v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 11:41 am
Bedsole v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 7:47 am
The Arkansas Case and the State Supreme Court’s Ruling The case of Mendoza v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
Two states, Iowa and Oklahoma, grant civil and/or criminal immunity to drivers who strike protesters with their cars. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 7:00 am
A for-hire motor carrier company’s self-reporting policy, which prohibited a driver from ever returning to the driver’s seat after self-reporting alcohol abuse, ventured past the DOT’s regulations on safety-sensitive jobs and into territory governed by the ADA, a federal district court in Arkansas stated, finding that the crucial failure of the policy—which applied to self-reporting drivers who had not otherwise engaged in DOT… [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 3:51 pm
By Eric Goldman Stebbins v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 4:26 am
Lyft Inc. and O'Connor v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:14 pm
Scott v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
[POL roundup; Santa Clara v. [read post]
