Search for: "DRUMMOND v. DRUMMOND" Results 161 - 180 of 202
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2011, 3:46 am by Russ Bensing
Drummonds, the 1st District notes that the Supreme Court’s decision in State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 10:13 am
Donald Drummonds D2001-0160 (transfer denied with dissent);Philip Morris Incorporated v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am by CMS
James Mure QC agrees with his Lordship. 1518: Lord Drummond Young raises the question of proportionality. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 8:00 am by Joy Waltemath
Despite the employee’s role in selling the employer’s products, it was not clear to the court that the employer had shown that she fell plainly and unmistakably within the outside salesperson exemption (Drummond v Herr Foods Inc, October 21, 2014, Schiller, B). [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 7:00 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
Gente sem vínculo com o submundo que conhece a outra face do barão da droga, a de festeiro em rodas de pagode e de incentivador do Carnaval e do futebol de várzea. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 1:42 pm by John Elwood
Drummond, 13-496, a state-on-top habeas petition involving when a rule is “clearly established” for purposes of the stringent review provisions of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act and which comes to us from the land of country music and non-union autoworkers, appears to be a hold after all – perhaps for White v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:02 am by Robert A. Epstein
Believe it or not, the Rules Governing the Courts for the State of New Jersey contain an entire section specifically devoted to family law practice – Part V – Rules Governing Practice in the Chancery Division, Family Part. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 5:11 am by David G. Badertscher
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 6:00 am by dnt.atheniense@gmail.com
“A grande maioria destes pedidos são válidos e a informação requerida é precisa para investigações criminais legítimas ou para a remoção de pornografia infantil”, precisou David Drummond, responsável legal da Google, que não precisou quantas das exigências dos estados foram satisfeitas pela empresa. [read post]
21 Aug 2007, 1:10 am
This development follows a recent problematic decision by the 2nd Circuit in AFSCME v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 7:05 am
It may be hiding in plain sight in US patent database (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Interview with Mike Drummond of Inventors Digest (IP Watchdog)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC: Impact of merger/buyout on prior agreement to not challenge patent validity: Epistar v ITC (Patently-O) (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC affirms in part, reverses in part, vacates in part and remands Linear Technology Corporation v ITC (ITC 337 Law Blog) CAFC: Genetech & Volkswagon… [read post]
11 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
Décision La preuve a révélé une planification minutieuse de la séance de sudation. [read post]