Search for: "DS v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 190
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2009, 3:24 am
MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; DS (Afghanistan) v Same [2009] EWCA Civ 226; [2009] WLR (D) 109 “A careful approach was to be applied when one was considering an asylum application and the question whether an asylum-seeker was excluded from the provisions of the Refugee Convention by reason of art 1F(c) [...] [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:55 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DS (India) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 544 (12 June 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) G(G) and B(S), R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1077 (12 June 2009) Campbell, R. v [2009] EWCA Crim 1076 (12 June 2009) High Court (Chancery Division) National Grid Electricity Transmission Plc v ABB Ltd [...] [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:52 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Noye, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 650 (22 March 2011) Whiston- Dew & Anor, R. v [2011] EWCA Crim 647 (22 March 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) DS (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 305 (22 March 2011) Revenue and Customs v Chamberlin [2011] EWCA Civ 271 (22 March 2011) MS (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 306… [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 8:45 pm by Martin Krause (DE)
Most notably, Regulation (EU) 2019/876 (CRR II) and Directive (EU) 2019/878 (CRD V) introduced some new O&Ds into the EU legislative framework while amending or removing others. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 504 This appeal considered whether the application of the revised benefit cap, introduced by the Welfare Reform and Work Act 2016, s 8, to lone parents with children under two years old (i) unlawfully discriminates against parents and/or the children, contrary to ECHR, art 14 with art 8, and/or art 2 of the First Protocol and in breach of the UK’s international obligations under the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, art 3, and/or (ii) is irrelevant. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Jessica Kroeze
The Opponents had raised objections on the grounds of Articles 100(a) and (b) EPC.The evidence cited during the opposition procedure includesD1: WO 2007/087243 A2;D2: WO 2004/041982 A1;D3: EP 1 867 708 A1;D4: V. [read post]