Search for: "DUKES v. STATE" Results 41 - 60 of 2,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 12:11 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 The surge has not only represented a significant problem in the states and communities immediately adjacent to the border, but increasingly in Northern cities as well, including New York. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 2:03 am by INFORRM
United States Patrick Reed’s $750m (£618m) defamation lawsuits against golf reporters and media outlets has been dismissed by a federal judge in Florida. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The DfE responded to the investigation by stating it would not be appropriate to comment on individual cases. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
  There was also a hearing in the case of Secretary of State for Defence v Persons Unknown. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 1:52 am by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal had struck out parts of the claim in December on the grounds of the former King’s state immunity. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
The ABA also publishes a regular Preview of United States Supreme Court Cases (available in HeinOnline; Duke NetID required) that provides an overview as well as legal analysis of each featured case. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anil Kalhan
Ultimately, of course, the Supreme Court vacated the Trump administration’s rescission of DACA in 2020 when—by a 5-4 margin, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing for the majority—it decided Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 10:06 am by Robert Fuller
Dukes, 564 U.S. 338, 351 (2011), to address the effectiveness of the waiver at the certification stage. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 7:55 am by Ben Sperry
Below, I elaborate first on how transaction costs doom the aims of age-verification and verifiable parental-consent laws, and then consider the state of First Amendment precedent for anonymous speech as it relates to age-verification laws. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
CalSTRS Escalates Efforts to Hold Global Companies Accountable for Not Adequately Disclosing Climate Change Risks Posted by Rebecca Forée, and Aeisha Mastagni, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, on Friday, August 25, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CalSTRS, Climate change, Proxy season SEC’s New Rules on Use of Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by Hardy Callcott, Jay Baris and Laurie Kleiman, Sidley Austin LLP, on Saturday,… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 6:30 am
CalSTRS Escalates Efforts to Hold Global Companies Accountable for Not Adequately Disclosing Climate Change Risks Posted by Rebecca Forée, and Aeisha Mastagni, California State Teachers’ Retirement System, on Friday, August 25, 2023 Tags: Board of Directors, CalSTRS, Climate change, Proxy season SEC’s New Rules on Use of Data Analytics by Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers Posted by Hardy Callcott, Jay Baris and Laurie Kleiman, Sidley Austin LLP, on Saturday,… [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
Part III applies these four aspects of common good constitutionalism, in roughly reverse order, to pending issues of Second Amendment doctrine after New York State Rifle & Pistol Ass'n v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 8:55 am by Lawrence Solum
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:02 am by Christine Corcos
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 10:02 am
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
This is significant in two broad sets of cases: those that rely on history to apply a constitutional rule (as lower courts are doing with the historical-analogical test prescribed by New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]