Search for: "DUTTON v. DUTTON" Results 81 - 100 of 124
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 4:20 pm by Barbara E. Lichman, Ph.D., J.D.
The Los Angeles City Council formally voted to oppose SB466, introduced earlier this year by Senator Bob Dutton, which would allow for structured negotiations regarding the transfer of ONT to a newly formed joint powers agency comprised of Ontario and San Bernardino. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:31 am by Gritsforbreakfast
Harold Dutton still carries a bill (see here) every session to change the standard back to what it what from the inception of the Open Records Act until that episode. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 1:38 pm by Jason Byrne
On November 16, 2010, the Court of Appeals approved its earlier September per curiam opinion in Dutton Partners LLC v CMS Energy Corp, No. 292094, for publication. [read post]
21 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm by Lyonette Louis-Jacques
 The judge dismissed the piracy charges, citing U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ, and Aston… [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 12:10 pm by David Smith
This was well-summarised by the Court in the following terms: (i) a claim for possession of land is the modern equivalent of a claim for ejectment (see the discussion in Secretary of State for the Environment v Meier [2009] UKSC 11; [2009] 1 WLR 2780, paragraphs 6-7, 26-33, and 59-61); (ii) a claim for ejectment (as opposed to a claim for an injunction in trespass) could only be maintained by someone who could establish a legal estate in the land (see e.g. per Lord Mansfield CJ, and Aston… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am by Dennis Crouch
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
  Thus, this bill would overrule the California Supreme Court in Chavez v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:45 am
" The phone number for the California Senate Rules Committee is (916) 651-4120 Chair of the Committee is Senator Darrell Steinberg e-mail: Senator.Steinberg@senate.ca.gov Phone: (916) 651-4006 Vice-chair Sam Aanestad Senator.Aanestad@senate.ca.gov (916) 651-4004 Gilbert Cedillo Senator.Cedillo@senate.ca.gov (916) 651-4022 Robert Dutton Senator.Dutton@senate.ca.gov (916) 651-4031 Jenny Oropeza Senator.Oropeza@senate.ca.gov (916) 651-4028 Bill Co-Sponsor Assembly Member Curt Hagman… [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:06 am by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Dutton-Lainson v The Continental Ins Griffith Oil v National Union Fire Grizzly Processing LLC v Wausau Underwriters Jefferson Block 24 Oil & Gas LLC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 12:14 pm by Mike Aylward
  Such is the case with an environmental coverage opinion that the Nebraska Supreme Court issued today in Dutton-Lainson Co. v. [read post]