Search for: "Dahms v. Downtown Pomona Property"
Results 1 - 2
of 2
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 May 2009, 8:00 am
Although the court applied the de novo standard of review instead of substantial evidence, the court still found that the assessments imposed by the City of Pomona through the creation of the Downtown Pomona Property and Business Improvement District (“PBID”) did not violate Article XIII D of the California Constitution.In Dahms v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
The court did point out that, as in Dahms v. [read post]
