Search for: "Daily v. Daily"
Results 101 - 120
of 16,837
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2010, 2:48 am
” WLR Daily, 12th May 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 2:59 am
” WLR Daily, 3rd December 2007 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 2:29 am
Awoyomi v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 2:30 am
Regina v Gnango [2011] UKSC; [2011] WLR (D) 365 “When two gunmen chose to indulge in a gunfight in a public place, each intending to kill or cause serious injury to the other, in circumstances where there was a foreseeable risk that an innocent bystander might be injured or killed, and one of the gunmen accidenatally shot and killed a passerby, both gunmen were guilty of murder.” WLR Daily, 14th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:52 am
Regina v Armstrong [2012] EWCA Crim 83; [2012] WLR (D) 22 “If in the military courts a judge did not approve of a course that a military prosecutor intended to take the proper course for the judge was to ask for the matter to be referred either to the Director of Service Prosecutions or to the Attorney General, as might be appropriate.” WLR Daily, 1st February 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
W v M and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam); [2011] WLR (D) 283 “Pursuant to section 4 of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 it was not in the best interests of a patient diagnosed as being in a minimally conscious state to authorise the withdrawal of all life sustaining treatment including nutrition and hydration by artifical means (‘ANH’).” WLR Daily, 28th September 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:16 am
Prest v Prest and others [2012] EWCA Civ 1395; [2012] WLR (D) 296 “The court had no jurisdiction in ancillary relief proceedings under section 24(1)(a) of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 to order a party (the husband) to transfer to the wife assets held by companies of which the husband was the controller or controlling shareholder, on the basis of that he was ‘entitled’ to them.” WLR Daily, 26th October 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 2:10 am
” WLR Daily, 25th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:20 am
Bamford v Harvey and another [2012] EWHC 2858 (Ch); [2012] WLR (D) 298 “‘Wrongdoer control’ of a company was not an absolute preclusive condition for the bringing of a derivative claim. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 3:32 am
Drake v Harvey and others [2011] EWCA Civ 838; [2011] WLR (D) 244 “There was no general default rule or presumption that the basis on which an outgoing partner’s share of partnership assets was to be determined was a fair value unless the partnership deed expressly stated otherwise; the correct approach was to derive the basis of valuation from the terms of the deed itself applying normal principles of contractual interpretation.” WLR… [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:27 am
Regina v Bewley [2012] EWCA Crim 1457; [2012] WLR (D) 197 “A weapon from which a missile could be discharged only by means of elaborate steps taken with the use of additional equipment was not a firearm within section 57(1) of the Firearms Act 1968.” WLR Daily, 6th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:30 am
Regina v K [2011] EWCA Crim 1691; [2011] WLR (D) 231 “Slavery, servitude and forced or compulsory labour were core elements of the criminal offence of trafficking into the United Kingdom for exploitation and failing to remunerate at the national minimum wage was not determinative of guilt.” WLR Daily, 8th July 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 4:25 am
Regina v Ayhan: [2011] WLR (D) 366 “An inaccurate memorandum of conviction committing a defendant to the Crown Court for sentence would not affect the validity of the committal provided the magistrates’ court had been vested with the necessary jurisdiction.” WLR Daily, 13th December 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:11 am
” WLR Daily, 26th April 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:24 am
Regina v M (A) [2012] WLR (D) 228 “Where there had been a breach of the balloting requirements in the selection of members of a jury, unless the defendant made clear his objection to the breach, at or as soon as practicable after, the time it occurred the irregularity could not be corrected on appeal.” WLR Daily, 24th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 4:48 am
Regina v A (RJ): [2012] EWCA Crim 434; [2012] WLR (D) 76 “A prosecution which did not constitute an abuse of process at the date of conviction could not acquire that characteristic on the basis of new or amended prosecutorial guidance or policy subsequently issued.” WLR Daily, 13th March 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 1:26 am
Joddrell v Peaktone Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 1035; [2012] WLR (D) 229 “The deeming provision, as to the restoration of a company to the Register of Companies, contained within section 1032(1) of the Companies Act 2006, was apt retrospectively to validate an action commenced by or against a company during the period of its dissolution.” WLR Daily, 26th July 2012 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 3:42 am
Chaudhary v Yavuz [2011] EWCA Civ 1314; [2011] WLR (D) 336 “In the context of a sale of property, great care would be required before one could conclude that it was ‘unconscionable’ for a purchaser to deny a right whose existence he could have ascertained merely by inspecting the property.” WLR Daily, 22nd November 2011 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 2:46 am
McGowan v B [2011] UKSC 54; [2011] WLR (D) 339 “There was no rule of the European Court of Human Rights that a suspect in police custody could only waive his right of access to legal advice before and during police questioning if he had first received legal advice as to whether he should do so.” WLR Daily, 23rd November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
24 Nov 2011, 3:47 am
Regina v Oldfield [2011] WLR (D) 337 “Where an application by a defendant to withdraw a plea of guilty involved a conflict between the defendant’s evidence and the evidence of his former counsel, the practice at many court centres by which a judge from elsewhere would be brought in to hear the application was to be commended.” WLR Daily, 22nd November 2011 Source: www.iclr.co.uk [read post]
