Search for: "Daimler Chrysler AG" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2022, 3:28 pm by luiza
In 2019 it was Fiat Chrysler, in 2020 it was Daimler, and in 2021 Toyota took the crown for its $180 million settlement of Clean Air Act violations. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 10:43 am by Joe Consumer
According to one recent report, The recall, which is expected to run until December 2019, involves airbag inflators with a ‘suspect propellant’ used on vehicles made by Acura, Audi, BMW, Chevrolet, Chrysler, Daimler Trucks North America (Sterling Bullet), Daimler Vans USA LLC (Sprinter), Dodge/Ram, Ford, GMC, Honda, Infiniti, Mazda, Mercedes-Benz, Mitsubishi, Nissan, Pontiac, Saab, Saturn, Subaru, Toyota and Volkswagen. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 9:34 am by Will Baude
(Will Baude) I have a post at SCOTUSBlog recapping yesterday’s decision in Daimler Chrysler AG v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 9:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
  In the case of Daimler/Chrysler AG v. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 3:59 am
A class action of hundreds of Chrysler executives recently won a ruling to reinstate a lawsuit for age discrimination against Chrysler's parent company, Daimler, AG. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 5:58 am by Simon Lester
The U.S. units of Bayerische Motoren Werke AG and Daimler AG will face duties of 2 percent and 2.7 percent respectively, it said. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 4:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following entities as the respondents in this investigation: Audi AG of Germany Audi of America, Inc. of Auburn Hills, Michigan Audi of America, LLC of Herndon, Virginia Bayerische Motoren Werke AG of Germany BMW of North America, LLC of Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC of Greer, South Carolina Chrysler Group LLC of Auburn Hills, Michigan Ford Motor Company of Dearborn, Michigan… [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 3:59 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Patent Nos. 6,374,180 (the ‘180 patent), 6,178,380 (the ‘380 patent), 6,029,111 (the ‘111 patent), and 5,862,511 (the ‘511 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): Audi AG of Germany Audi of America, Inc. of Auburn Hills, Michigan Audi of America, LLC of Herndon, Virginia Bayerische Motoren Werke AG of Germany BMW of North America, LLC of Woodcliff Lake, New Jersey BMW Manufacturing Co., LLC of Greer, South Carolina Chrysler… [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 3:25 pm
Although reluctant at first to file a suit, Dan's horrible treatment by Daimler-Chrysler (Fay's employer and owner of the car she was driving) and their insurance company, Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., forced him to seek the help of the Oregon car accident lawyers at Shulman DuBois LLC. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 9:32 am by Susan Brenner
Daimler Chrysler Corp.,427 F.3d 939 (11th Cir. 2005).] [read post]
17 May 2011, 3:43 am by Steven M. Gursten
Daimler Chrysler Insurance Company – “This Isn’t Even  Insurance! [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 9:00 pm
As yet, however, we have not seen much attention paid to tax implications of the deal, in the same way the Daimler-Chrysler merger drew attention to the uncompetitiveness of the U.S. corporate tax system. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 10:17 pm
What's now Daimler AG is the remainder of DaimlerChrysler AG after its sale of Chrysler to Cerberus Capital Management in 2007.Daimler AG is sued in its capacity as the owner of Old Chrysler. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:08 am
Earlier this month, United States Bankruptcy Judge Arthur Gonzalez in New York entered an order allowing an organization of creditors of former Chrysler LLC to file a lawsuit against Daimler AG alleging fraudulent transfer of a significant portion of Chrysler's assets on the eve of the 2007 sale of Chrysler by Daimler to Cerberus Capital Management LP. [read post]
11 May 2009, 7:23 am
The Defendant moved for summary judgment claiming that it had never manufactured or sold Mercedes-Benz vehicles and that Daimler-Benz AG manufactured the car and DaimlerChrysler AG, a German company, was the successor in interest to Daimler-Benz AG. [read post]
11 May 2009, 7:23 am
The Defendant moved for summary judgment claiming that it had never manufactured or sold Mercedes-Benz vehicles and that Daimler-Benz AG manufactured the car and DaimlerChrysler AG, a German company, was the successor in interest to Daimler-Benz AG. [read post]