Search for: "Dais v. Department of Navy" Results 1 - 20 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 3:05 pm by Berry Law
What the Ruling Means On November 5, 2020, the Northern District of California ruled in favor of Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans by enforcing the 29-year-old Class Action Consent Decree that arose in Nehmar v. the US Department of Veterans Administration (VA). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] heard oral arguments [day call, PDF; merit briefs] Wednesday in Milner v. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 7:56 am by Aurora Barnes
The petitions of the day are: Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 8:17 am by Howard Friedman
Department of Navy (Docket No. 20-1794): A case in litigation for over 20 years involving allegations by non-liturgical Protestant chaplains of discrimination against them by selection boards that control promotions and early retirements of Navy chaplains. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:55 am by Lyle Denniston
Department of Navy (09-1163) — Right of access to information about government storage of explosive munitions that may pose a risk to neighboring population. [read post]
29 Jun 2008, 6:32 pm
Paulk was the published Air Force Court decision rejecting an equal protection challenge to military trial and appellate judges' lack of a fixed term of office in the Air Force and Department of the Navy, in contrast to the Army and Coast Guard. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 3:32 pm by Regan Zambri Long
Listed below are local “National Drug Take Back Day” participating locations and addresses: Fairfax County, Virginia: Fair Oaks District Station – 12300 Lee Jackson Memorial Highway, Fairfax Franconia District Station – 6121 Franconia Road, Alexandria Mason District Station – 6507 Columbia Pike, Annandale McLean District Station – 1437 Balls Hill Road, McLean Mount Vernon District Station – 2511 Parkers Lane, Alexandria Reston Hospital– 1850… [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 6:01 pm by Joy Waltemath
In a suit seeking to hold those who hired the employee who killed 13 individuals at a Navy Yard in 2013 liable for negligent retention and supervision, a federal court in the District of Columbia refused to change its ruling that a heightened foreseeability standard did not apply to the claims and that the plaintiffs sufficiently supported a finding that the defendants had knowledge of the shooter’s mental instability before the day of the shooting but allowed him to continue… [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 6:30 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
On Friday, the Department of Justice filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in IRAP v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 10:14 am by admin
Supreme Court’s decision in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:53 am by luiza
  Yesterday (September 28), DOJ announced the Virginia-based aircraft maker agreed to pay $8.1 million to settle charges it violated the False Claims Act in connection with its Navy contracts to manufacture the V-22 Osprey military aircraft. [read post]