Search for: "Daniel Epps"
Results 161 - 180
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2021, 8:46 am
Markey Distinguished Professor, Arts & Sciences (chair) James Akinleye, Student Bar Association presidentRebecca Brown, vice chancellor and chief of staff to Chancellor Andrew MartinDan Epps, Treiman Professor of Law, School of LawJennifer Gibbs, senior program manager, Special ProjectsAnna Gonzalez, vice chancellor for student affairsJohn Inazu, Sally D. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 3:53 am
Additional coverage of the argument comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Adam Liptak in The New York Times, Daniel Fisher at Forbes, and Bill Mears at Fox News, who reports that “the eight justices appeared divided over just what kind of violations by the U.S. government against foreigners merit legal action, and whether courts should even get involved. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 2:57 am
Daniel Epps, a law professor at Washington University in St. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 3:12 am
And at Issue One, Daniel Hensel has “everything you need to know about” Virginia governor Bob McDonnell’s challenge to his fraud convictions. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:26 am
” At Law360 (subscription required), Daniel Walfish analyzes Lucia’s “practical significance for pending and future cases, and the Trump administration’s unusual bid to weaken the independence of ALJs. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am
Pre-argument commentary comes from Richard Lugar in The New York Times, Garrett Epps in The Atlantic, and Anil Kalhan at Dorf on Law (with a shorter essay in Washington Monthly). [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 7:40 am
” At least one former clerk – Professor Daniel Epps of Washington University Law, who clerked for Justice Anthony Kennedy from 2009-2010 – nevertheless considers the study’s finding “a bit surprising. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
” Additional commentary comes from Garrett Epps at The Atlantic, Dahlia Lithwick at Slate, Daniel Nichanian in an analysis for NBC News, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, here and here, Lisa Soronen at the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, and Richard Hasen at Slate, who suggests that “Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s lone dissent provides two paths forward to mount new attacks on these voter-suppression laws based on their discriminatory impact. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 10:57 am
CSU San Bernardino 1980 Redlands Daniel J. [read post]
31 May 2023, 8:23 pm
Earlier this year, Danielle D'Onfro and Dan Epps wrote an interesting article that the Fourth Amendment should be understood not in light of a specific state's law but in light of general law—the unwritten, transjurisdictional law that was ubiquitous in federal courts during the era of Swift v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:36 am
At Article 8, Daniel Hensel criticizes recent comments by Justice Antonin Scalia about the separation of church and state. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
Commentary comes from Garrett Epps in The Atlantic, Elizabeth Slattery at The Daily Signal, Jessica Mason Pieklo at Rewire, James Gottry in an op-ed for the Washington Examiner, Elizabeth Reiner Platt at Religion Dispatches, Michael Farris at Fox News, Paul Horwitz at PrawfsBlawg, Erik Stanley in an op-ed for The Kansas City Star, and Cristian Farias at New York Magazine’s Daily Intelligencer. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 4:18 am
” Daniel Fisher discusses the decision in Forbes, noting that the Justice Clarence Thomas “wrote a dissent raising deep questions about the rights of citizens versus the government and the reach of the 14th Amendment. [read post]
16 May 2018, 4:27 am
” At Medium, Daniel Hemel observes that “[n]ot only did the Supreme Court strike down the federal law at issue, … but it also appears to have invalidated a broad swath of congressional limitations on state tax authority. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 6:05 am
Other coverage of yesterday’s decision comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Bill Mears of CNN, Daniel Fisher of Forbes, and Jaclyn Belcyzk of JURIST. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:36 am
” In The Atlantic, Garrett Epps discusses Hasty v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 4:15 am
Daniel Ortner argues at the Pacific Legal Foundation blog that “[a]lthough the facts of this case focus narrowly on public access television networks, the Supreme Court’s decision has significant implications for all property owners, the internet, and social media more specifically. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:00 am
Penman 1987 10 $3,026,000* No Redlands 69,231 General Law Yes Appointed Daniel J. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:58 am
Danielle D’Onfro had this blog’s argument preview; Grace Brosofsky and Luís L. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Daniel S. [read post]
