Search for: "Danielle Citron, Benjamin Wittes"
Results 21 - 37
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am
In response to Robert Chesney and Danielle Citron’s breakdown of the threat posed by “deep fakes,” Herb Lin offered a technological solution to the problem that the pair failed to consider. [read post]
28 Jul 2018, 4:53 am
Stewart Baker interviewed Chesney on his recent paper with Danielle Citron: “Deep Fakes: A Looming Challenge for Privacy, Democracy, and National Security" on the Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 11:56 am
Alan Rozenshtein sat down with Danielle Citron to discuss the dangers posed by technology and the market to intimate privacy, what can be done to fight back, and her research and advocacy in the area of digital privacy: Quinta Jurecic discussed the Oct. 28 attack on Paul Pelosi, husband of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, in his San Francisco residence. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:58 am
Matthew Kahn posted the Lawfare Podcast, a conversation between Benjamin Wittes and Dan Radosh about Radosh’s new show “Liberty Crossing. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 9:05 pm
Danielle Citron of the University of Virginia School of Law and Benjamin Wittes of the Brookings Institution argue that Section 230’s “immunity is too sweeping. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 2:06 pm
Jen Patja Howell shared an episode of the Lawfare Podcast featuring a conversation on cheapfakes and political campaigning with Lawfare’s Benjamin Wittes, Quinta Jurecic and Jacob Schulz, as well as Boston University law professor Danielle Citron. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 9:06 am
Panelists include: Benjamin Wittes, Brookings senior fellow and editor-in-chief of Lawfare; Quinta Jurecic, Brookings fellow and senior editor of Lawfare; Danielle Citron, professor at the University of Virginia, School of Law; and Kate D’Adamo, partner at Reframe Health and Justice Consulting. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 11:22 am
Danielle Citron and Benjamin Wittes proposed a simple system to improve civility on Twitter. [read post]
9 May 2019, 6:55 am
Danielle Citron has spent her career documenting the dark side of the internet, and most recently she and Benjamin Wittes have examined the harm done by bad Samaritans on the Internet to argue for reforming certain types of regulation. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Frosio, Université de Strasbourg – CEIPI The Internet Will Not Break: Denying Bad Samaritans Section 230 Immunity, Fordham Law Review, Forthcoming, U of Maryland Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2017-22, Danielle Keats Citron and Benjamin Wittes, University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law and Brookings Institution. [read post]
8 Sep 2018, 8:02 am
In a paper for the Hoover Institution’s Aegis Series, Danielle Citron and Quinta Jurecic delved further into the subject of content regulation on major technology platforms, outlining the dangers and possibilities of legislative and technological solutions to content moderation. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
At any rate, the capacity to generate persuasive deep fakes (and, critically, user-friendly software enabling almost anyone to exploit that capacity) will diffuse rapidly and globally (in keeping with the dynamics Benjamin Wittes and Gabriella Blum explore in their compelling book The Future of Violence). [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 6:10 am
This Internet exceptionalism provided protection for sites designed specifically to purvey offensive materials, even in the absence of any good faith efforts to address the abusive content.[2] The breadth of the immunity was recently summarized and criticized by Danielle Citron and Benjamin Wittes in a law review article published in the United States: Platforms have been protected from liability even though they republished content knowing it might violate the… [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, for instance, seemed to be channeling an amicus brief filed by law scholars Mary Anne Franks and Danielle Citron on behalf of the Cyber Civil Rights Initiative: Throughout the argument, Jackson questioned how a statute aimed at providing liability relief for companies that go out of their way to remove harmful and illegal material should somehow come to mean that internet companies are fully protected from liability when they actively promote… [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 8:19 am
Danielle Citron and Benjamin Wittes have argued that the protection of Section 230 should be narrowed, to the point where it would only be available to those who make “reasonable efforts” to moderate the content on their platforms (although how to define what is reasonable is not spelled out). [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:01 am
Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act has long provided internet platforms like Twitter and Facebook with immunity from claims based on third-party content that appears on their platforms. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 2:06 pm
Join Lawfare Editor in Chief Benjamin Wittes and Steve Vladeck, professor of law at the University of Texas School of Law, for a Zoom webinar. [read post]
