Search for: "Daniels v Social Security, Commissioner of," Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2024, 1:19 am by INFORRM
The Privacy and Information Security Law Blog has more information here. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
FEC Case Dissent from Dismissal Commissioners’ Statement of Reasons (May 6, 2021) Federal Election Commission, Michael Cohen et al. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
When the Social Security Administration finds him entirely disabled, he goes back to the NFL and gets his benefit increased to a higher tier, but not the highest tier. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:29 am by Norman L. Eisen
Eisen, Siven Watt, Joshua Stanton and Fred Wertheimer, The Untold Strength of Tax Crimes in Manhattan DA’s Case Against Former President Trump, Just Security (May 24, 2023) Daniel Hemel, The Question of Tax Fraud in Manhattan DA’s Case Against Former President Trump, Just Security (May 23, 2023) Karen Friedman Agnifilo interview by Paras Shah, The Just Security Podcast: An Indictment of Donald Trump, Just Security (March 31, 2023) Joshua… [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
The deputy commissioner erroneously concluded that the claimant’s employment neither exacerbated nor contributed to the injurious altercation. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Congress has been very clear in the federal securities laws when it intends to preempt state law, such as in the National Securities Markets Improvement Act[44] or the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.[45] Indeed, such a broad claim of Commission authority might raise issues under the major questions doctrine discussed in West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  DRE]Joseph Dolley (wiki)Shortly after 1900, Joseph Dolley, Kansas’s state banking commissioner, noticed that the state’s residents, dissatisfied in an inflationary time with the interest on savings accounts in commercial banks, were purchasing the exceedingly dubious securities of newly formed corporations, “beautifully engraved or lithographed certificates of stocks and bonds, which soon proved to be worthless. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
Evidence was also heard from the private investigators Steve Whittamore and Daniel Portley-Hanks, whose services had been used by MGN. [read post]
14 May 2023, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
Facebook Another Must-Carry Lawsuit Against YouTube Fails–Daniels v Alphabet Congressional Jawboning of Internet Services Isn’t Actionable–AAPS v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
The Federal Court has issued a permanent injunction against social media influencer, ASX Wolf, who gives financial advice to paid subscribers. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:56 am by Unknown
According to the rulemaking petition, the soon-to-be-argued Supreme Court case Slack Technologies, LLC v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am by INFORRM
” A human operator would then evaluate if a flagged security concern necessitates action. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
The BBC said the decision was “based on concerns raised by government authorities worldwide regarding data privacy and security. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 1:08 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Nugent asserted that privately-operated social media platforms may actually constitute public spaces in which first amendment protections are enhanced, based on Marsh v. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:04 pm
” “The Commission’s report documents the Chinese government’s continued use the tools of authoritarian governance to centralize power, restrict basic human rights, and maintain majoritarian social control,” said CECC Cochair McGovern. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Landmark Supreme Court Fight Over Social Media Now Looks Likely MSN – Robert Barnes and Ann Marimow (Washington Post) | Published: 9/19/2022 Conflicting lower court rulings about removing controversial material from social media platforms point toward a landmark U.S. [read post]