Search for: "Daniels v. Thompson et al" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2007, 11:34 am
For publication opinions today (3): Anita Stuller, et al v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:11 am by Kevin LaCroix
 Of these “fixes,” the most commonly used one is computed at 4:00 pm by a joint venture between State Street’s WM unit and Thompson Reuters (Thompson Reuters was also involved with setting the Libor rates).9] However, at least one recent article discussed potential investigations into “Tokyo fixing”, referring to Japanese currency benchmarks (which are set at 9:55 each morning in Tokyo).[10] The potential attempted manipulation of these… [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
Advising inventors, their spouses, and their start-up companies: James Joyce v Armstrong Teasdale (Patently-O) District Court N D California: Use of patent reexamination evidence in parallel litigation: Volterra Semiconductor Corporation v Primarion Inc (Patents Post-Grant) District Court E D California: Government’s approval of false marking settlement precludes later challenge that settlement was “staged” and therefore lacks preclusive effect: Champion… [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 10:06 am by Mary Whisner
Neuschatz et al., The Effects of Accomplice Witnesses and Jail-house Informants on Jury Decision Making, 32 Law & Hum. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Thompson III at Vinson & Elkins in Houston and Daniel J. [read post]
25 May 2012, 8:27 am
Thompson III at Vinson & Elkins in Houston and Daniel J. [read post]