Search for: "Daniels v. United States District Court for the Central District of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 79
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:15 am
Nicholas Louis Geranio, Keith Michael Field, The Good One, Inc., and Kaleidoscope Real Estate, Inc.Case number: 12-cv-04257 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: May 16, 2012Qualifying judgment/order: November 1, 2013 12/20/2013 03/20/2014 2013-119 SEC v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am
In a short but carefully-structured opinion issued March 2, Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California held that the plaintiffs’ claims do not “touch and concern” the United States with sufficient force to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of the ATS set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am
The provision, passed in 1992, allows “[a]ny national of the United States injured in his or her person, property, or business by reason of an act of international terrorism, or his or her estate, survivors, or heirs” to sue and recover threefold damages in “any appropriate district court of the United States. [read post]
15 May 2020, 8:17 am
See District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 5:37 am
Wilson v Williams No. 20-3447- the Sixth Circuit declined to overturn a district courts preliminary injunction which ordered federal officers to remove certain at-risk inmates from a coronavirus ridden prison in Ohio. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 2:05 pm
Decision from ESWR’s site Audio from 9th Circuit and from ESWR Text follows: Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Dolly M. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am
Here in the Central District of California, that means filing your motion 28 days before the hearing date you've chosen. [read post]
7 May 2010, 4:00 am
The Wall Street Journal (and their Law Blog) had an amusing piece recently about the jockeying underway for the position of lead counsel in the Toyota Motor Corporation Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Multidistrict Litigation, which has been consolidated in the Central District of California: Lawyer Daniel Becnel Jr. of Reserve, La., donated a kidney to his sick brother. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
On June 23, 2021, the United States Supreme Court held in a 6-3 ruling written by Chief Justice John Roberts in Cedar Point Nursery v. [read post]
12 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, she sues Daniel in federal district court. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Plaintiffs claimed that the defendants, four Chinese producers of vitamin.C, conspired to fix prices and production levels for vitamin C exported to the United States. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 6:30 am
Archer-Daniels-Midland CompanyCase number: 13-cv-02279 (United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois)Case filed: December 20, 2013Qualifying Judgment/Order: January 21, 2014 02/24/2014 05/25/2014 2014-17 SEC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2015, 1:44 pm
The case before the Court is Doe v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 11:56 am
District Court for the Central District of California via Scribd] [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:27 am
State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 5:23 am
LamparielloCase Number: 09-cv-00818 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Date Filed: July 16, 2009Date of Qualifying Order/Judgment: February 23, 2016 4/29/2016 7/28/2016 2016-60 SEC v. [read post]
