Search for: "Daniels v. United States District Court for the Central District of California"
Results 21 - 40
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
AIR QUALITY AND CLIMATE CHANGE United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:44 pm
LaserCase number: 09-cv-09144 (United States District Court for the Central District of California)Case filed: December 14, 2009Qualifying judgment/order: February 12, 2014 3/24/2014 6/23/2014 2014-30 SEC v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 7:01 pm
The District Court upheld the ban; part of the Court’s analysis stated that magazines did not exist at the time the Second Amendment was ratified. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 6:27 am
The district court dismissed the defamation claim not only on actual malice grounds, but also because the term “hate group” is not provably false (as required to state a defamation claim). [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:34 am
District Court Wednesday afternoon to the charge, which stemmed from an investigation by U.S. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of California and held that an NPDES discharge permit was required under the Clean Water Act for the Central Valley Grasslands Bypass Project (“Project”). [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Daniel Bergin Case number: 13-cv-01940 (United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas) Case filed: May 23, 2013 Qualifying Judgment/Order: August 18, 2015 10/30/2015 1/28/2016 2015-118 SEC v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
District court: No. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
San Diego Unified Port District v. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
District Court case where the court remanded the rule to the agencies but allowed it to stay in place. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:00 am
District Court case where the court remanded the rule to the agencies but allowed it to stay in place. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
” Fast forward to 2019, when the court relisted Daniel v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
And the Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
CASES PENDING AT THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME COURT There are no CEQA cases pending at the California Supreme Court. 3. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 4:39 am
The speech here was commercial, and the court determined that Zauderer, rather than Central Hudson, applied. [read post]
