Search for: "Darby v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 6:10 am by Wells Bennett
Lawfare returns to Fort Meade’s storied CCTV outpost, this time for arraignment in the Guantanamo military commission case of United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by Jane Chong
Moscati issued this statement yesterday on developments in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 7:00 am by Sarah Grant
  Issues Related to the Deposition of al-Darbi The direct examination of al-Darbi consumed the bulk of the week and gave rise to a number of discussions in 802 conferences and open session. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
This evidence was sufficient to carry plaintiff's initial burden on his motion (see Whiteman, Osterman & Hanna, LLP v Oppitz, 105 AD3d 1162, 1163 [2013]; Levine v Harriton & Furrer, LLP, 92 AD3d 1176, 1178-1179 [2012]; J.B.H., Inc. v Godinez, 34 AD3d 873, 875 [2006]), and Cascino's "self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated" (Darby… [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:41 am by tracey
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) O’Connell v Rollings & Ors (Administrators of Musion Systems Ltd) [2014] EWCA Civ 639 (21 May 2014) Darby & Darby (A Firm) v Joyce [2014] EWCA Civ 677 (20 May 2014) Mitsui Sumitomo Insurance Co (Europe) Ltd & Ors v Mayor’s Office for Policing and Crime [2014] EWCA Civ 682 (20 May 2014) Hines v London Borough of Lambeth [2014] EWCA Civ 660 (20 May 2014) Northumbrian Water Ltd v… [read post]
16 Sep 2013, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, we agree with Supreme Court that defendant's general claims of verbal refusals to pay did not constitute a specific objection sufficient to defeat plaintiff's cause of action for an account stated (see Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]; J.B.H., Inc. v Godinez, 34 AD3d at 875-876; PPG Indus. v A.G.P. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 6:21 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Under these circumstances, we agree with Supreme Court that defendant's general claims of verbal refusals to pay did not constitute a specific objection sufficient to defeat plaintiff's cause of action for an account stated (see Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]; J.B.H., Inc. v Godinez, 34 AD3d at 875-876; PPG Indus. v A.G.P. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 2:15 pm by Giles Peaker
And then there was Darby (administratrix of the estate of Lee Rabbetts deceased) v Richmond Upon Thames LBC. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Defendant's oral and undocumented objections to the remaining bills do not suffice to create triable issues as to the remaining amount owed (see Brill & Meisel v Brown, 113 AD3d 435, 437 [1st Dept 2014]; see also Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]). [read post]