Search for: "Darby v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 166
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2010, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
  Here, in Sklover & Donath, LLC v Eber-Schmid ; 2010 NY Slip Op 02002 Decided on March 16, 2010 ; Appellate Division, First Department  the justices borrow from an unidentified law review article to state that hindsight is "an unreliable test for determining the past existence of legal malpractice" (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000] [law review source omitted]). [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 2:10 pm by Jordan Brunner
William Ford posted the Fourth Circuit’s ruling in IRAP v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 6:42 am by Guest Blogger
Dagenhart and its overruling case of Darby Lumber. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
Darby Lumber, Inc. (9th Cir. 2004) 357 F.3d 1000. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by William Ford
Sharon Bradford Franklin explained how United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 pm by christopher
Becker SEE MY PREVIOUS POST CAMBRIDGE NIL GEORGIA STATE NIL A COPYRIGHT DARBY ANALYSIS Share on Facebook [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:50 am by JB
Here are the questions I've put together for teaching The Health Care Cases, NFIB v. [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 3:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Attorneys are free to act in a manner that is "reasonable and consistent with the law as it existed at the time of representation," without exposing themselves to liability for malpractice (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315; see Noone v Stieglitz, 59 AD3d 505, 507; Iocovello v Weingrad & Weingrad, 4 AD3d 208, 208). [read post]