Search for: "Darmanin v. Darmanin" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
An award of fees against a bad faith litigant is not a sanction, or punitive, but reflects the additional and unnecessary costs imposed on the innocent party
13 Mar 2012, 8:51 am by PaulKostro
Darmanin, 224 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
A relevant factor to be considered by the motion judge on an application for counsel fees is whether a litigant has acted in bad faith
21 Oct 2009, 1:52 pm
” Critical to a consideration of bad faith is the recognition that an award of fees against a “bad faith” litigant is not a sanction, see Darmanin v Darmanin, 224 N.J. [read post]
NJ Family Issues - http://www.kostrolaw.com/NJFamilyIssues
HRW: ‘healthy’ European democracies continue to curb civil society
5 Jan 2023, 9:34 am by Akanksh Naik | National Law University, Delhi, IN
According to the V-Dem Institute, the COVID-19 pandemic aggravated democratic backsliding around the world. [read post]
JURIST - Paper Chase - https://www.jurist.org/news/
Law and Media Round Up – 19 February 2024
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am by INFORRM
The court found that Darmanin’s remarks “do not impute to [Benzema] any fact that is likely to undermine his honour or his reputation. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/