Search for: "Dates v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 30,171
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Regina (Modhej and another) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2012] EWCA Civ 957; [2012] WLR (D) 210 “Where the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence at a time by which, subsequent to the original passing of sentence, the law had changed in relation to release on licence, it was not the case that reliance could be placed on the particularities of such date in order to claim that it was the later provisions which governed… [read post]
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF: Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE - Times Law Reports
29 Oct 2008, 10:17 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF: Same v AM; Same v AN; Same v AE Court of Appeal “While as much information as possible, without imperilling national security, should be disclosed to a person subject to a control order, it was arguable that there was no irreducible minimum the nondisclosure of which would automatically make a trial unfair. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:38 pm
District Court, District of Columbia Docket Number: 1:23-cr-00257 Citation: United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2007, 3:43 am
Challenging deportation decisions quickly Regina (Madan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Regina (Kapoor) v Same Court of Appeal “Applications for judicial review of deportation decisions had to be made promptly. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 2:42 am
Regina (Kelly) v Secretary of State for Justice; Regina (Bailey) v Same; Regina (Gibson) v Governor of Wymott Prison Court of Appeal “In the criminal sentencing context, the court could read words into a statutory instrument to correct a drafting omission. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 1:09 pm
On August 7, 2008, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a notice identifying the applicability date of regulatory provisions relating to applications containing patentably indistinct claims which are enjoined in Tafas v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 12:19 pm
Updates on Epic Games’ Antitrust Battle: Stayed in Australia, Date for Google, and an Uncertain Verdict Awaits Epic Games, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
United States. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm
Ohio Democratic Party and Kiara Diane Sanders v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 2:21 am
Court can hear appeal on jurisdiction point Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:21 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:26 pm
DISMISSED – Driving on a Suspended License, State v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 2:48 am
” (See Brownell v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 2:29 am
Secretary of State for Defence v. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 8:49 pm
The post State v. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 8:24 am
Bulale v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “The Court of Appeal did have jurisdiction in rare cases to pursue of its own motion a point of general importance not raised below in order to ensure the state's compliance with its international obligations. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State for Justice power to block the release on licence of prisoners sentenced between 1991 and 2003 to prison terms of more than 15 years, was not compatible with article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, providing that anyone deprived of his liberty had the right to have the lawfulness of his detention decided… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless there were other aggravating features such… [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 12:52 pm
In US v. [read post]
