Search for: "Dates v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 30,173
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
Case citation: Howell v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 2:14 pm
State v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 11:47 am
State, ruled:By order dated April... [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:27 pm
In April, 2007, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department, ruled in the case of Donna Fordham-Coleman v. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 8:00 am
The Court did announce an argument date for STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 1:33 pm
State of California v. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 4:29 pm
Yesterday, the Fourth Circuit moved the likely oral argument date in Hennis v. [read post]
2 Sep 2021, 3:55 pm
In Herrera v. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 9:36 am
TB (Jamaica) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “It would be wrong as a matter of principle if the Secretary of State for the Home Department could circumvent the decision of an immigration appeal tribunal by an administrative decision. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:19 am
In strictly construing the statute the court found nothing in section 7 requiring a claimant to state the date of the completion of the contract. [read post]
20 Jan 2024, 1:46 pm
In Parque Towers Developers, LLC v. [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
28 Nov 2015, 7:42 am
United States. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
I'm playing catch-up this week, so here's a belated summary of United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 4:00 am
It has been clear at least since Obergefell v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 3:47 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 5:03 am
The United States Supreme Court has already ruled that Americans can do what they want in the privacy of their own bedroom, Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 1:40 am
State v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 1:15 am
Regina (G) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust; Regina (N) v Secretary of State for Health; Regina (B) v Nottingham Healthcare NHS Trust Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Preventing detained mental patients from smoking was not a breach of article 8, right to respect for private and family life, or article 14, prohibiting discrimination, of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 4:56 pm
Date: October 29, 2020 State v. [read post]
